Even though I’ve already come out in support of Gary Johnson, I have to admit that I’m kind of glad to see Paul make this step forward. There are plenty of arguments in support (or against) either of the pro-liberty candidates we’re looking to have. I have my opinions, and other folks have theirs. It’s all good. However, having two candidates may well work out for the best for everyone.
I’ve been as guilty as anyone of thinking that the liberty movement can really only support one guy. In reality, that still remains to be seen. While Johnson is somewhat more likely to resonate better with independents and moderates, Paul will resonate better with the Tea Party groups. This adds a somewhat more diverse mix listening to the pro-freedom messages of both candidates.
Yes, eventually one candidate will probably bow out. Let’s face it, the odds aren’t great that even one of these men will win the nomination. The odds aren’t particularly great that both will make it all the way to the convention. One will, more likely admit defeat and probably endorse the other one. It doesn’t really matter either way. You see, those who liked the message of one are far more likely to find plenty to like in the other anyways.
The pro-liberty movement will, eventually, settle behind one of the two. Yes, I do believe the best man is Johnson, but that doesn’t mean I wouldn’t support Paul if Johnson bowed out. I can’t think of any other Johnson supporters who wouldn’t do the same. Truth be told, I suspect the same can be said of Paul supporters as well.
Ideally, I want to see a real pro-liberty candidate win the nomination and, hopefully, the White House. It would be wonderful to have a President I could defend on a regular basis for once. However, if the best we can do is raise awareness, aren’t two voices better than one anyways?